William Lilly
A reference page compiled from cited source texts and reviewed interpretive rules.
Source-linked rules available.
Reviewed citations or interpretive rules are available on this page.
Biography
Early modern astrologer represented by Christian Astrology, used as a procedural and rule-structure source in the corpus.
Public pages should show citation metadata and reviewed locators rather than passage text.
Several Lilly keys distinguish all-volume and Books 1 and 2 witnesses; this profile preserves the broad compatibility citation and avoids edition-specific expansion.
The source-work metadata records Christian Astrology as first published in 1647 and notes that edition varies by scan or source witness.
Use this profile for Lilly-linked Christian Astrology material already tracked in the citation registry and source inventory.
William Lilly is represented through Christian Astrology, used by the corpus for early modern procedural timing and rule structure.
Source basis
Early modern astrologer represented by Christian Astrology, used as a procedural and rule-structure source in the corpus.
Public pages should show citation metadata and reviewed locators rather than passage text.
Several Lilly keys distinguish all-volume and Books 1 and 2 witnesses; this profile preserves the broad compatibility citation and avoids edition-specific expansion.
The source-work metadata records Christian Astrology as first published in 1647 and notes that edition varies by scan or source witness.
Use this profile for Lilly-linked Christian Astrology material already tracked in the citation registry and source inventory.
William Lilly is represented through Christian Astrology, used by the corpus for early modern procedural timing and rule structure.
Source texts
- William Lilly, Christian Astrology (1647). 1 citation.
- William Lilly, Christian Astrology, All Three Volumes (1647). 1 citation.
- William Lilly, Christian Astrology, Books 1 and 2 (plus all-volumes scan) (1647). 1 citation.
Interpretive rules
Rules are included when they are directly assigned to this tradition or cite a source by this author.
No reviewed interpretive rules are listed for this astrologer yet.