CAJS Rar Ms 164, astrological and magical treatises with Abu Ma'shar material

Definition

Source-cited definition for this reference record.

CAJS Rar Ms 164, astrological and magical treatises with Abu Ma'shar material is a source text in the reference library.

The text is cataloged with Traditional astrology context.

Definition sources

(n.d.). CAJS Rar Ms 164, astrological and magical treatises with Abu Ma'shar material.

Source textCAJS Rar Ms 164, astrological and magical treatises with Abu Ma'shar materialCover image not listed

Bibliographic

TraditionTraditional astrology

PeriodModern Contemporary

CompositionTraditional source chronology has not yet been reviewed; defaulted to unknown.

PublicationPublication year not yet reviewed in source-work metadata.

ISBNNot listed

Reference coverage

Technique areas1

Reviewed facts1

Reference note

More source notes pending.

More reviewed source notes are still being prepared for this page.

Source notes

CAJS Rar Ms 164, astrological and magical treatises with Abu Ma'shar material is included so related doctrine and astrologer pages can link to a stable source page.

Find this text

Search Amazon

Method coverage

Technique areas in the reference library that cite this source.

Reference context

Ia Subject Astrology Source Review

ReviewedReference Context11

Reviewed facts

Source-backed fact rows extracted from this text, with public exposure boundaries preserved from the engine bundle.

Under review · Reference context

Source Catalog Context

CAJS Rar Ms 164 is cataloged as Abu Ma'shar-adjacent manuscript context and remains held for folio-level review.

source:TRAD-CAJS-RAR-MS164Reference metadata onlyNoneNeeds Source Reviewabu-mashar, arabic-manuscript, cajs-rar-ms164, ia-subject-astrology, source-context

Citation locations

No reviewed citations

No reviewed citations are published for this source yet. Reviewed citation links will appear here as the reference library expands.

Interpretive rules

Rules appear here when they cite this source text.

No interpretive rules

No reviewed interpretive rules are listed for this source text yet.

All sources